Hammonds v. State

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of armed robbery. He appeals, both pro se and through counsel, the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial.

1. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to . grant a new trial because the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Two eyewitnesses (one of whom was the victim) identified appellant as the individual who had approached them with a sawed-off shotgun, forced them to lay on the ground and be searched and drove off with the victim’s car.’ Later the same night, appellant was seen by the police driving the stolen…