Legal Opinion

St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 7,878PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; R. H. Buck, Judge. Action by George W. Armstrong against the St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

At various dates, beginning December 10, 1910, and ending June 9, 1912, appellee delivered in separate lots to the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company and the St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Company some 1,312 head of cattle for transportation to cattle markets of the country. Nine of the shipments were from Scullin, Okl., to the National Stockyards, Ill., two from Roff, Okl., to the same place, three from Roff to Kansas City, and two from Roff to Ft. Worth, Tex.; there being 16 separate shipments in all. Appellee alleged unreasonable delays in the several shipments, resulting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Texas Railway Co. v. HalsellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CurrieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. City of Dallas v. BeemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ara v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Baker v. Nance Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Janesville Live Stock & Shipping Ass'n v. HinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Wilkins v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MayhughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API