Legal Opinion

Rogers v. ROGERS

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 17, 1952No. 16603PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

By agreement of counsel, these two actions were consolidated and are now before this Court on question relating solely to the construction of the wills of J. R. Rogers and A. Maude Hamer. In the order of consolidation, it was stipulated that all other issues raised by the pleadings should be reserved until the wills were construed.

J. R. Rogers died in February, 1946, leaving of force a will dated November 28, 1944, and a codicil thereto dated February 22, 1945. The controversy here relates primarily to what estate in the personal property was given by the testator to his…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith T. v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Byrne's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Peoples Nat. Bank, Greenville v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. Wates v. Fairfield Forest Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Dye v. Beaver Creek ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tarver v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  2. Estate of Theodore Geddings Tarver, Deceased, the Citizens and Southern National Bank of South Carolina v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. Spell v. TraxlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. RIKARD v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. SHEVLIN v. Colony Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API