Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1989No. 02807PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal involves the question of the validity of a progression charge in a homicide case; i.e., whether the trial court may instruct the jury not to consider whether the defendant is guilty of voluntary manslaughter until after it has considered whether the defendant is not guilty of murder. Appellant contends that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the progression charge. We find that the the court’s instruction was proper and that counsel provided effective representation.

I

On August 11, 1975, Albert Dixon, an Exxon employee, was fatally wounded during an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. LawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. United States v. Andrew TsanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Berry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. State v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API