Legal Opinion
Gibson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 11, 1991No. 90-835PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHIVERS, Chief Judge.
Gibson is an indigent who was adjudged guilty in two cases which were consolidated for trial. The trial court departed from the guidelines for three reasons. Two reasons were found invalid by this court in Gibson v. State, 519 So.2d 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In answer to a certified question from this court, the supreme court found the third reason invalid in Gibson v. State, 553 So.2d 701 (Fla.1989).
At resentencing Gibson was sentenced within the guidelines. At the sentencing hearing the trial court asked the prosecutor what Gibson’s appeal cost the county and told Gibson…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Gallucci v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- State v. ByrdSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lawley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Womack v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Womack v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- GRACE ANN KING v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023