Legal Opinion

Penny v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the District Court of Noble County; before Bay-ard T. Earner, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court bv

Beauchamp, J.:

This is a suit upon an appeal bond given by the defendants F. A. Richardson, Joseph Murray and W. C. Monroe for the purpose of appealing from a judg- meat oí restitution rendered against them in favor of E. Penny, on the 8th day of March, 1895, in a justice of the peace court in an action of forcible entry and detainer, in which E. Penny was plaintiff, and F. A. Richardson, Joseph Murray and W. C. Monroe were defendants. The district court affirmed the decision of the justice of the peace, and from such judgment of the district court the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Hinckley v. . KreitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Coonradt v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Church v. . SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. International Bank v. PoppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dolese Bros. Co. v. Chaney RickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Hampton v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Gillespie v. FrisbieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. American Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Wolber v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API