Wolber v. Rose
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MAXEY, C.
The will of W. M. Rose was presented to the county court of Le Flore county for probate. The probate thereof was contested by Mary Wol-ber, I. M. Bible, and H. Adams, and the county court denied the probate of the will, and from the judgment of the county court the proponent appealed to the district court. From the judgment of the district court, admitting the will to probate, this appeal is prosecuted.
Counsel for contestants, plaintiffs in error, who will hereafter be referred to as contestants, say that the nine assignments of error contained in the record all go to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Reinhart v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- Fitzpatrick v. EngardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- In Re Will of Me-Hun-KahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Clark v. LathamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Anderson's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Morrison v. LinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929