Legal Opinion

In re the Assignment of the George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Submitted on briefs April, 27, 1894. Decided May 22, 1894. Petition that the receivers of an insolvent corporation be directed to pay to the petitioner the amount of a decree in his favor as a preferred claim, under Act No. 94, Laws of 1887. Petitioner appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The petitioner was for several years in the-employ of the George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Company as its general collecting agent. He had a written contract during the year 1.883, which was renewed in 1884. He continued in the same employment under the terms of the written contract uuti.1 he was discharged, in January, 1887. February 11, of that year, he commenced an action at law in the circuit court for Jackson county. The declaration ivas on the common counts. A bill of particulars was filed, the items of which are substantially as follows:

For salary as agent for one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Assignment of George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bank of Montreal v. J. E. Potts Salt & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michigan Trust Co. v. Grand Rapids DemocratMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Lawton v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Tefft v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  4. Addicott v. UptonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Addicott v. UptonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API