Legal Opinion
State v. Burns
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 23, 1995No. 13681PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant, who was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; General Statutes § 14-227a (a);1 appeals, following a conditional plea of nolo contendere *10to the second part of the information,2 challenging the imposition of enhanced penalties under General Statutes § 14-227a (h) (3).3 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss the second part of the information because his conviction of a third violation of driving while under the influence did not occur within five years of a prior conviction.4…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. MattioliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. ClintonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995