Legal Opinion
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Clinton
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 1, 1995No. 13428PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendant Judith Clinton appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering her to proceed with an appraisal.1 She claims that the. trial court (1) did not have jurisdiction to consider the plaintiff’s application to compel the appraisal and (2) improperly granted the application to compel the appraisal because (a) the court failed to consider the rights of the parties, (b) General Statutes §§ 52-410 and 52-411 provide statutory relief only for an aggrieved insured, not an insurer, and (c) the plaintiff presented no evidence of an appraisal agreement or of a dispute as to the value of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- City of Bridgeport v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Terra Industries, Inc. v. Commonwealth Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Steiner v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- J. Wise Smith & Associates, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
- Germano v. Preferred Mutual Ins. Co., No. Cv95 32 80 64 S (May 24, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. ClintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.