Legal Opinion

Outar v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 10, 2001PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover *672damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Courf, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated June 28, 2000, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on their cause of action to recover damages based on a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1), and granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the provision thereof denying the motion and substituting therefor a provision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Narducci v. Manhasset Bay AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Rodriguez v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Schreiner v. Cremosa Cheese Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jock v. Landmark Healthcare Facilities, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Orner v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Bornschein v. ShumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Cammon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Lucas v. Fulton Realty PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API