Legal Opinion
Pezl v. Amore Mio, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 4, 2009No. 08 C 3993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.
John Pezl (“Plaintiff’) brings this purported class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Transactions Act (“FACTA”) amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), codified as 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g), against Amore Mio, Inc., and Doe Defendants 1-10 (collectively “Defendants”). (R. 14, First Am. Compl.) Currently before the Court are Plaintiffs motion for class certification and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (R. 53, Pl.’s Mot. for Class Cert.; R. 64, Defs.’ Mot. for Summ. J.) For the reasons stated below,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Arreola v. GodinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Wheeler v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Springer v. DurflingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Carol B. Oshana v. Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Friedman-Katz v. Lindt & Sprungli (USA), Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Grimes v. Rave Motion Pictures Birmingham, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
- Hammer v. JP's Southwestern Foods, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2010
- Allen v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Rowden v. Pacific Parking Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.