Legal Opinion
Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 6, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
93 N.J. Super. 49 (1966)
224 A.2d 689
JAMES N. ROSENAU AND NORAH ROSENAU, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY, AND WORTHINGTON GAMON METER COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 14, 1966.
Decided December 6, 1966.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Edward K. Zuckerman argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. Frank N. Yurasko argued the cause for respondent Worthington Gamon Meter Company of Newark, New Jersey (Messrs. Champi, Graham and Franchino, attorneys; Mr. Robert M. Graham, on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Kyle v. Green Acres at Verona, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Tortorello v. ReinfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Heller v. U. S. Suzuki Motor Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Arrow Transportation Company v. Fruehauf CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1968
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. AbagnaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.