Ginsberg v. Ginsberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
Plaintiff and defendant are husband and wife and are living together. The wife recovered a judgment for damages based on negligence against the husband. Included in the judgment was a substantial sum for special damages and this is the sole ground of appeal. It is found that some of these special damages have been paid by relatives of the plaintiff and that she has agreed to reimburse them therefor and that, as to the remainder, the surgeon and dentist involved are looking to the plaintiff alone for payment. The question to be decided is whether a wife can recover from her husband special…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Fuller v. Naugatuck RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
- Mathewson v. MathewsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Katz v. CohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lorang v. HaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Dzenutis v. DzenutisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Landers v. LandersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Shreve v. FarisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bencomo v. BencomoSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.