Legal Opinion
Piatt v. Oliver
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
Decided December 15, 1837PublishedCited by 6 opinions
In equity.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT. The complainant represents that about the 20th July, 1S17, he. John I-I. Piatt (then living, but since deceased). William M. Worthington, and Gor-ham A. Worth, being the equitable owners of river lots, numbers one, two, eighty-six, and eighty-seven, in the United States, reserve of twelve miles square, on the Miami of Lake Brie: And that Martin Baum, Jesse Hunt, now deceased. Jacob Burnet, William C. Scbenck, William Barr, William Oliver, and Andrew Mack, being owners in equity of numbers three and four, in the same reserve; it was agreed between them that the said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seth v. CramerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
- State of New York v. State of Connecticut Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1799
- Fellows v. FellowsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
- Griswold v. WaddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Mitchell v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1804
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Loyd v. MaloneIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
- Lyon v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Barrett v. Bath Paper Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1880
- Domenech v. GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1920
- Phippen v. StickneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1841
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.