Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Voss v. Ralston

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1976No. 4542Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

GUTHRIE, Chief Justice,

with whom McCLINTOCK, Justice, joins (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I would concur in the reversal of this judgment upon a very different basis than the majority. I specifically do not agree that the most important or crucial issue .in this case is the construction of § 1-710.2, W.S.1957, 1975 Cum.Supp.

In order that the basis of my concurrence and dissent is clear, it will be necessary to recite some facts as to the posture of this appeal, and particularly my disagreement with the statement in the majority opinion as to the crucial question therein involved.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, LARAMIE CTY SCH. D. NO. 1 v. SpiegelWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. SternWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Stuebgen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API