Legal Opinion
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Lindquist
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 20, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01508Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 ALLSTATE INDEMNITY CASE NO. C20-1508JLR COMPANY, 11 ORDER Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 RANDY LINDQUIST, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Before the court is Defendant Randy Lindquist’s motion for partial summary 18 judgment. (Mot. (Dkt. # 147); Reply (Dkt. # 166).) Plaintiff Allstate Indemnity 19 Company (“Allstate”) opposes Mr. Lindquist’s motion, moves for a continuance under 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d), and also cross-moves for partial summary 21 judgment on its alleged violations…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.