United States v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHESON, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Matthew Williams of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344(1), and aggravated identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. He appeals and asks that we reverse his convictions because the evidence against him was insufficient.
Mr. Williams began a mortgage loan application at Pulaski Bank (the “bank”) using his father’s personal and financial information and his status as a Purple Heart veteran. After his father received the application packet in the mail, he called the bank to explain he had not applied for a loan. The bank referred the matter…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Nick StavroulakisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. ChristyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. TaoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. $37,564,565.25 in Account Number Xxxxxxxx9515 at Morgan Stanley, in the Name of Anicorn LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.