Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1994No. 9201-00214; CA A78550PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*518EDMONDS, J.

In this action for declaratory relief, defendant appeals from the trial court’s ruling that plaintiff is entitled to contribution from defendant. Defendant argues that the trial court erred when it held that it was an insurer of Cyrene Curtin and that, therefore, plaintiff was entitled to contribution for damages that plaintiff had paid to individuals who had been injured by Curtin. The trial court ruled that defendant’s status as an insurer of Curtin arose under the provisions of the Financial Responsibility Law (FRL). ORS 806.010 et seq. We reverse.

The parties stipulated to these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Viking Insurance v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Champlain Casualty Co. v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. PannellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. New Hampshire Indem v. Budget Rent-A-CarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. New Hampshire Indemnity Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Haynes v. Tri-County Metropolitan TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API