Legal Opinion
Pasadena Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Pasadena
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 12, 2018No. B275566PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
*151Following our decision in Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. Superior Court (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 268, 192 Cal.Rptr.3d 486 ( Pasadena Police ), the Los Angeles Times (Times) moved for attorney fees from the City of Pasadena (City) under the California Public Records Act ( Gov. Code, § 6259, subd. (d) ) (PRA). The Times also sought fees from the City, the two involved police officers and the Pasadena Police Officers Association (PPOA), under the private attorney general statute ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1021.5 (hereafter § 1021.5 ) ). The trial court ultimately awarded the Times limited fees under…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nat'l Conference of Black Mayors v. Chico Cmty. Publ'g, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Amgen Inc. v. Health Care ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Burgess v. Coronado Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Bustos v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Caballero v. Bill Muncey Industries CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.