Carswell v. Sanders
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Chief Justice.
The controlling question in this case is whether a described tract of land must be ascertained strictly by the metes and bounds stated in a deed, or be confined to the exact quantity of land set forth in the deed. The land in controversy *252has passed from the original grantor and grantee by later purchases. The description in the deed is as follows: “Lots Nos. 4 and 5 in T. F. McFarland’s survey of — a part of land lots Nos. 68 and 69 in the 9th District and 4th Section of Walker County, Georgia, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kendall v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Harris v. HullSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Thompson v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Holder v. Jordan Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steadham v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Stewart v. LatimerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Southernaire Corp. v. WorleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Floyd v. CarswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- McConnell v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.