Legal Opinion

Carswell v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 28, 1936No. 10660PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Chief Justice.

The controlling question in this case is whether a described tract of land must be ascertained strictly by the metes and bounds stated in a deed, or be confined to the exact quantity of land set forth in the deed. The land in controversy *252has passed from the original grantor and grantee by later purchases. The description in the deed is as follows: “Lots Nos. 4 and 5 in T. F. McFarland’s survey of — a part of land lots Nos. 68 and 69 in the 9th District and 4th Section of Walker County, Georgia, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kendall v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Harris v. HullSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Thompson v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Holder v. Jordan Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steadham v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Stewart v. LatimerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Southernaire Corp. v. WorleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Floyd v. CarswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. McConnell v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API