Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maben v. Norvell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1958No. 36661Published

1Dissent

HALLEY, Justice.

It is with regret that I am compelled to dissent from the majority opinion in this case.

This case was tried by an able and eminently fair trial judge whose judgment in this case is sustained both by the evidence and the law. I set out here that part of his decision handed down on the 25th of February, 1954, not shown in the majority opinion:

“This suit is brought upon a written assignment. The genuineness of this assignment is the sole factual question which I am compelled to decide, or rather only the signature attached to that assignment -purporting to be the signature of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sabin v. LevorsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Townsend v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Donnelly v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Mitchell v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Walters v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API