Legal Opinion
Nap, Inc. v. Shuttletex, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 11, 2000No. 98 Civ. 7776(VM)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff NAP, Inc. (“NAP”), a New York corporation which manufactures women’s clothing for sale under the Crab-tree & Evelyn label, brought this diversity action naming as defendants Shuttletex, Inc. (“Shuttletex”), a New Jersey company which is currently in bankruptcy proceedings, and Shuttletex’s commercial general liability insurer, U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. (hereinafter, “USF & G”), whose successor in interest is the St. Paul Companies, Inc. NAP seeks damages from Shuttletex for breach of an express and implied…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. MitlofDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- MBIA Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Zyburo v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Rodland v. Judlau Contracting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.