Legal Opinion

Nickle v. Reeder

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1917No. 7860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Action by J. -S. Reeder against Charles Nickle. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

■Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

This is an action, originating in a justice of the peace court of Oklahoma county, to recover damages for fraudulent -misrepresentations alleged to have been made by the plaintiff m error to the defendant in error, relied upon by the defendant in error, and inducing him to purchase from the plaintiff in error a restaurant stock and fixtures in the city of Oklahoma City. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below. The defendant assigns but two errors as grounds for the reversal of the judgment of the trial court.

The first is that the court erred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Garvin v. HarrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. McLean v. Southwestern Casualty Ins. Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Greene v. HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Graves v. MayberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Woods v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Seneca Co. v. DarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API