Legal Opinion
Graves v. Mayberry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 2, 1929No. 19171PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
Defendant in error was plaintiff below, and will be herein referred to as plaintiff. Plaintiff in error was defendant below, and will be herein referred to as defendant.
This is an action in replevin brought by plaintiff to recover the possession of certain personal property, consisting of tools, appliances, and supplies used in conducting a battery station, together with certain buildings used in connection- therewith, located on lots belonging to the city of Wilson, and one Ford touring ear.
Plaintiff sold the battery station to defendants, R. O. Graves and Charley Johnson,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McFadyen and Brown v. MastersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Reger v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Broyles Et Ux. v. McInteerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wilson v. RentieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Stone v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Berry v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Roark v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Cherry v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Mondie v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.