Witkop & Holmes Co. v. Boyce
New York Supreme Court
Action to restrain defendant from wrongfully using information confided to him by plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff, a domestic corporation engaged in the business of retailing teas, coffees, baking powder, spices and dry groceries, maintains stores in several cities in western Hew York. In Buffalo it has a store at 145 Swan street, where business is maintained by employing about twenty young men, furnished with horses and wagons, assigned to different sections of the city, through which they drive soliciting orders for such groceries as 'plaintiff handles, later delivering the same, collecting the moneys therefor and all sales being made for cash; the plaintiff’s drivers using cards,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- New Method Laundry Co. v. MacCannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Conviser v. J. C. Brownstone & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Witkop & Holmes Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.