Legal Opinion
City and County of Honolulu v. Churchill
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided October 27, 2000No. 99-670 ACKPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT TRUSTEES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CONTRACTUAL DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION AND DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS OAHU SUGAR AND NORTHBROOK’S COUNTER-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAY, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are fully set forth in the Court’s Order dated June 14, 2000, granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss counts I, III, and IV. The following summarizes only those facts necessary for an understanding of the disposition of the issues in this motion.
This case arises out of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.