Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. WN144245 v. The Vision AFH LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 23, 2021No. 3:20-cv-05662Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT TACOMA 6 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. Case No. C20-5662 TLF 7 WN144245, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 8 Plaintiff, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND v. DENYING MOTION TO CERTIFY 9 THE VISION AFH LLC, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment 13 (Dkt. 21) and defendant Nitschke’s motion to certify (Dkt. 32). For the reasons set forth 14 herein, the Court: 15 • DENIES Nitschke’s Motion to Certify (Dkt. 32); 16 • GRANTS Underwriter’s Motion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Nigro v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API