Hutchins v. George
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue, and set-off. Trial by the Montpelier City Court, Erwin M. Harvey, Judge. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This is an action of contract in the form of general assumpsit brought before the City Court of Montpelier. The defences were the general issue, or denial, and set-off. Trial was by the court and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff to recover $22.82, as damages, and costs. The defendant brings a bill of exceptions.
The writ in this case was dated December 7, 1916. The defendant had previously brought an action in the form of general assumpsit against the plaintiff. That action had been, returnable, to the court that tried this, November 13, 1916, and, the defendant there, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
- Davenport v. HubbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
- Armstrong v. ColbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
- Carver v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
- Kezar v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- In Re Estate of LenoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Pope v. BIRCHWOOD MANOR CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Franklin County Realty Corp. v. CunniusSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969