Legal Opinion

Srygley v. City of Nashville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This is a suit to recover damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff, under a written contract, served defendant as superintendent of its schools from September 1, 1930, to September 1, 1935', at a monthly salary of $600. Plaintiff, at the expiration of the five-year period without.any new contract, continued to serve defendant in the same capacity until December 27, 1937, when he was summarily discharged without notice or trial. Plaintiff insists that under the foregoing facts his contract, by operation of law, was renewed for an additional five-year term. We infer from the declaration that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase v. . Second Avenue Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. Gilbert & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Schott v. La Compagnie Generale Trans-AtlantiqueNew York Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Price v. Mercury Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  2. In Re Estate of Lana Hopson ReedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API