Legal Opinion

Schott v. La Compagnie Generale Trans-Atlantique

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to recover damages for breach of contract of employment.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages for breach of contract of employment. The case came on for trial before a court and jury, and the court submitted to the jury the single question whether or not the plaintiff had been discharged for cause, and the jury found as matter of fact that he had not. It appears that the plaintiff entered the employment of the defendant at an early age, and in 1884 made a contract with the defendant for a period of seventeen years. Differences arose between the plaintiff and the defendant, and on February 28, 1889, a new contract was entered into…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riley v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Chase v. . Second Avenue Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tynan v. KSTP, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Lonsdale v. J. A. Migel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Wood v. MillerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  4. Srygley v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Watters v. Plumbers' Trade Journal Publishing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API