Pollak v. Millsap
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appellants filed a bill to effect the equity of redemption of property alleged to be subject to an equitable mortgage. The trial court sustained demurrer to the bill, and dismissed' it for want of equity.
The facts which appellants claim create such an equitable mortgage are alleged in substance as follows:
They borrowed money from one Kirtley, and executed a mortgage on the land involved in this suit to secure the debt. The debt was not paid when due, and the mortgage was foreclosed, the mortgagee being the purchaser. A few days before the expiration of two years in which to redeem, appellants…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Butts v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Micou v. AshurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Newlin, Fernley & Co. v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Lewis v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Woods v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Flyge v. FlynnNevada Supreme Court · 1946
- Talley v. EastlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.