Legal Opinion

Roland v. Tift

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Mitchell. Tift superior court. December 9, 1907.-

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

This case comes before us on an exception to the dismissal of the plaintiff’s case on general demurrer. The petition was brought by Joseph Roland against H. H. Tift, to recover damages for a personal injury, and contained the following allegations, in substance: In February, 1902, Tift owned and was operating a *684'sawmill. In connection therewith he operated a railroad (not chartered) for the purpose of hauling logs to the mill to be manufactured into lumber, and transporting his employees to and from their work at the mill and in the woods. Early in the morning, and before dajq petitioner, who…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Worlds v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Ellington v. Beaver Dam Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. McGuirk v. ShattuckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. White v. Kennon & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Railey v. Garbutt & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Great Southern Lumber Co. v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Kilgo v. Rome Soil Pipe Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API