Legal Opinion

Railey v. Garbutt & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Hart. Laurens superior court. July term, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

Railey sued Garbutt & Company, a partnership, for damages on account of personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the negligence of the defendants. Upon the trial the following appeared to be the undisputed facts in the case: The defendants owned a sawmill and in connection with it operated a railroad for the purpose of hauling logs from the woods to their mill *289and of transporting their employees from their mill to the woods. Plaintiff was employed by them as a stock cutter and was on a train of defendants consisting of an engine, tender, and flat car, being transported to his place…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. NelmsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Ellington v. Beaver Dam Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Brush Electric Light & Power Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. White v. Kennon & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moore v. Dublin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API