Legal Opinion

State v. McGinnis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge. The defendant, Hattie McGinnis, was tried and convicted of the crime of keeping a house of ill fame, and from the judgment following, she appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

1. The defendant, Hattie McGinnis, having been convicted of the crime of keeping and setting up, for the purpose of prostitution, fornication, and lewdness, a house of ill fame, which, it is alleged, she owns and to the possession of which she is entitled, appeals from the judgment which followed. Her counsel contend that the alteration of a section of the Code, which formerly defined the offense and prescribed the punishment for a commission thereof, having .been preceded by the clause, “is hereby amended so as to read as follows,” repealed the prior law,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eddy v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Allison v. HattonOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Renshaw v. Lane County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Small v. LutzOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Stingle v. NevelOregon Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Caleb v. BeesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of Woodburn v. AplinOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. VallinOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source, LLC v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Portland v. BlueOregon Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API