Richmond v. Aiken
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal from the Court of Chancery. The facts in the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
*325The opinion of the court was delivered by
Redeield, Ch. J.
This is a bill to foreclose two mortgages, executed by Willard and Rodney C. Caryl, to Lemuel Richmond, of two lots of land in Barnard, or parts of said lots. The first of these mortgages is dated the 2fith day of December, A. D. 1829, and the second on the 18th day of May, A. D. 1831, and they were both conditioned to save said Lemuel Richmond harmless, for signing a note with the said Willard to one Ephraim D. Briggs, for the sum of one thousand dollars, as surety for the said Willard. The said note is dated the 13th day of August,…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Capehart v. . DettrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Colonial & United States Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Clute v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Fitzgerald v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- State v. LacklandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.