Legal Opinion

Benton v. State, Division of State Lands & Forestry, Department of Natural Resources

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1985No. 18914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Floyd E. Benton and Professional United Development (“the plaintiffs”) appeal from a summary judgment in these consolidated actions. This appeal involves mineral leases issued by the State of Utah on a single tract of property: lots five and six of section eighteen, township one south, range two east, Salt Lake meridian (hereinafter “lots five and six”). In 1970, one lease was given to Professional United Development, in 1981, another was given to Floyd E. Benton, and in 1981, still another lease was given to Portland Cement Company of Utah (“Portland”). The plaintiffs sought…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allred v. HinkleyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Baker v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Richins v. Industrial Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. Frisco Joes, Inc. v. PeayUtah Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
  2. Willamette Quarries, Inc. v. WodtliOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  4. Fibro Trust, Inc. v. Brahman Financial, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Nassi v. HatsisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API