Legal Opinion

Navajo Nation v. Department of Health & Human Services, Secretary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 2003No. 99-16129PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal focuses on the interplay between two federal statutes: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (“TANF”) and the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (“ISDEAA”). The specific question we address is whether an Indian tribe may administer TANF, a welfare grant program, through a self-determination contract under the IS-DEAA. Like the district court, we conclude that TANF does not qualify as a contractable program under the ISDEAA.

BackgrouNd

Until recently, the federal government played a dominant role in administering welfare. Although…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Lincoln v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Citizens Exposing Truth About Casinos v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & Cupeño Indians v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Akhtar v. BurzynskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API