Navajo Nation v. Department of Health & Human Services, Secretary
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal focuses on the interplay between two federal statutes: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (“TANF”) and the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (“ISDEAA”). The specific question we address is whether an Indian tribe may administer TANF, a welfare grant program, through a self-determination contract under the IS-DEAA. Like the district court, we conclude that TANF does not qualify as a contractable program under the ISDEAA.
BackgrouNd
Until recently, the federal government played a dominant role in administering welfare. Although…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lincoln v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Citizens Exposing Truth About Casinos v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla & Cupeño Indians v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Akhtar v. BurzynskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.