Legal Opinion

In Matter of Palfy

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 9, 1972No. B71-1203PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KRUPANSKY, District Judge.

This proceeding has been transmitted to the District Court by the Bankruptcy Referee for a hearing before a jury at the bankrupt’s request and as authorized by § 17a(2) and § 17e(5) of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, to determine the non-dischargeability of certain debts.

The Referee’s transmittal was in keeping with the policy of the Judicial Conference of the United States discouraging Referees in Bankruptcy from conducting jury trials. See Report of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States, March 1960, at page 22.

The instant case presents…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Curtis v. DrybroughDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re CurtisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
  2. Walsh v. Long Beach Honda (In Re Gaildeen Industries, Inc.)District Court, N.D. California · 1986
  3. In the Matter of Law Research Service, Inc. v. John Herbert CrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Data Compass Corp. v. Datafast, Inc. (In Re Data Compass Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  5. Matter of CopelandDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API