Legal Opinion

Smith v. Texas Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 10, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

In an action at law the Court below directed a verdict for the defendant, which was an oil company being sued for the recovery of $1,358.90, alleged refund due on the price paid for gasoline, which plaintiff below contended the defendant had agreed to refund-because of a condition of collection, similar to the circumstances dealt with by this Court in the case of Gilmore v. Texas Company, 100 Fla. 169, 129 Sou. Rep. 587. This case, however, unlike the Gilmore case just cited, does not turn upon the construction of a written contract, but is based entirely upon an alleged verbal contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. T. G. Bush Grocery Co. v. ConelySupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  2. Chase & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. McLeod v. Citizens Bank of Live OakSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Gilmore v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCabe v. HowardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Phan v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. American Lad. & Scaf. Co. v. Miami Vent. Awn. Mfg. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Kennedy & Cohen, Inc. v. Allen Appliance Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  5. DADE CTY. POL. BEN. ASS'N v. City of HomesteadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API