Mead v. Baum
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beed, J.
This action was brought by Mary D. Mead and her husband to recover damages for an injury to Mrs. Mead, *338occurring upon the premises of the defendant, on July 4th, 1905.
The lady had gone to Lincoln Park with her father to witness an exhibition of fireworks. Lincoln Park is owned by the defendant and is used as a pleasure resort. On this 4th of July the grounds and buildings had been rented for a picnic to the Letter Carriers’ Association. Within the park is a restaurant and dance pavilion. The dimensions of the latter are fifty-nine by one…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gleason v. BoehmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Buchanan v. West Jersey RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rademacher v. TorbensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Childers v. ShannonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Weaver v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983
- Schroeder v. Boeing Commercial Airplane Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Friedman v. KlazmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.