Skreen v. Rauk
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson; Justice.
Certiorari to review an award of compensation.
Three questions are presented for decision: (1) Whether a finding that relator and respondent stood in the relation of employer and employe was justified by conflicting evidence, which, according to respondent’s version, sustained an affirmative finding, and, according to relator’s version, did not; (2) whether a finding that respondent was not a farm laborer was justified by conflicting evidence, of which some was to the effect that relator was engaged for “many” years in the business of commercial threshing as well as farming…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Elsenpeter v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Larson v. Le MereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Carl v. DetoffolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Campos v. TomoiNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Hawthorne v. HawthorneNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Dockery v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Youngner v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Westfall v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970