Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel., Arthur v. Hammett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShain, P. J.

This case involves the question of incorporation of a drainage district. The cause was before this court for review at the October Term, 1940, and an opinion was written by Commissioner Campbell. The opinion was duly adopted by this court and handed down on September 26, 1940. Thereafter, motion for rehearing was filed and for the first time the question of our jurisdiction was raised. By reason of the jurisdictional question this court granted a rehearing and additional briefs were filed and the cause was re-argued and resubmitted at the March Term, 1941, of this court.

After reconsideration,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Upon the Information of Shartel v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Potter v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. State Ex Rel. Abeille Fire Insurance v. SevierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. DeKalb County v. HixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  5. Collier v. Catherine Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pearson Drainage District v. ErhardtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Waller v. City of MaconMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. City of Colton v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Spivack v. SpivackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API