Legal Opinion
Monski v. Lukomske
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvert, J.
This case was tried to the court and from the finding the following facts appear: The plaintiffs, William and Felicia Monski, are husband and wife. The defendant is the former’s niece. On June 1st, 1929, she executed a mortgage and note secured thereby upon her home in Fairfield for $7000, for a loan by him to her in that amount. Prior to that date, his first wife had died at his home in Jersey City, and the defendant had assisted him in breaking up his household affairs and moving to Bridgeport, where she resided with her husband. Shortly after William Monski became a part of her family, he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKelvey v. CreeveySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. DevineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Andrews v. New Britain National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Peck v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Stavnezer v. CooleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Worobey v. SibiethSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Connelly v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Connelly v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'NDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Day v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
- Kolodney v. KolodneyConnecticut Superior Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.