State v. Gould

Baker, J. —

Carl Gould appeals his conviction for first degree robbery. He contends the court erred by (1) admitting untimely evidence identifying his stepbrother as the individual seen with him shortly after the crime, and (2) denying his request for continuance in order to research the issues raised by the identification evidence. In a pro se brief, Gould argues several other errors were made at trial. We affirm.

I

Facts

The robbery occurred as follows: A clerk at an Auburn pharmacy observed a man enter the store. The pharmacist was filling prescriptions when the man, whom he later identified…