Legal Opinion

Doherty v. Romano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 16, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover compensation for personal injuries received by him and for damage done to his automobile through coming in contact with a cable, with a bucket suspended therefrom, while driving along Amboy avenue, between Metuehen and Perth Amboy. The trial resulted in a verdict against the defendants, the jury awarding the plaintiff compensation for the damage done to his automobile, but allowing him nothing for personal injuries, and the former thereupon applied for and obtained the present rule.

The material facts are as follows: The defendants…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dewey v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Resto Negrón v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
  3. Brown v. Krakowski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1949
  4. Negrón v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API