Legal Opinion

Hutton v. Padgett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 23, 1867PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Oircnit Court for Charles county. ' This was an action upon a guaranty brought by the appellees against the appellant. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of this Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBartol, J.

This suit was instituted by the appellees, upon the following guaranty :

“I hereby hold myself responsible to W. A. & W. W. Padgett, of Baltimore, Maryland, to the amount of $2,000, for any drafts they have accepted, or may hereafter accept, for John Latouche, now of Alexandria, Va.”
“Witness my hand this 16th of May, 1860.
“Jos. Hutton.”

At the trial below, the plaintiffs, after proving the signature of Jos. Hutton to be that of the defendant, further proved that subsequent to the date of the paper, they accepted and paid drafts of said Latouche, drawn- on them, to the amount of $2,000, and then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nabb v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  2. Wyman v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1826

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Booth v. Irving National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Heyman v. DooleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  3. Roberts v. Woven Wire Mattress Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Deutsch ex rel. Kanders v. BondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API