Legal Opinion
Fass v. Gray. Candell v. Gray
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 15, 1952No. 11282_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
These appeals concern war veterans and Government employ. The principal question presented involves appellants’ rights to reassignment, a reduction in force having occurred in the offices in which they were employed. This question is not whether these veterans should have been retained in the positions which they held; it is whether, their positions having been eliminated, they must be reassigned to other positions now held by other employees. The process of reassignment involves placing the higher prftference eligible in a position held by another employee with less…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hilton v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Powell v. Brannan, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Stringer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Elder v. BrannanSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Powell v. Brannan, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Orin Thomas Grier v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Raymond E. Dodd v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Lester K. Born v. George v. Allen, Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Enola E. Freeman, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.