Legal Opinion
Haller v. Advanced Industrial Computer Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 7, 2014No. CV-13-02398-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Defendant Advanced Industrial Computer, Inc. (“AIC”) has moved for judgment on the pleadings for claims three through six. Doc. 13. The motion has been fully briefed. For the reasons listed below, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion with leave for Plaintiffs Seth and Laura Haller to file an amended complaint.1
I. Background.
Defendant AIC is a California corporation that provides computer servers and peripheral storage devices. Doc. 8 ¶ 5; Doc. 13 at 1. Plaintiffs are Seth Haller and his wife, Laura Haller. Doc. 8 ¶¶3-4. Mr. Haller was employed by AIC…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Skunk IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- J.M. v. Red Roof Franchising, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Waggoner v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023