Legal Opinion

State v. Amato

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 28, 1975No. 7077 & 7078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The sole question presented in this case is whether the State is required to produce at trial, pursuant to a request seasonably filed under RSA 262-A:69-k (Supp. 1973), the person who certified a breathalyzer machine prior to the test in issue in order to prove the .correct operation of the machine. The defendants were convicted of violating RSA 262-A:62 (Supp. 1973). The Trial Court (Harkaway, J.) reserved and transferred the de fendants’ exceptions.

The facts of these cases are not in dispute. Amato was arrested on April 26, 1974, and Watkins was arrested on March 16, 1974, both for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ferretti v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  2. State v. LarochelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  3. Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  5. Frizzell v. CharlestownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. State v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Auclair Transportation, Inc. v. Ross Express, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. State v. Van WieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API